Contract with a self-employed person by 1 October 2026: what to rewrite before the deadline
289-FZ, 160 hours, and the cooling-off period — how to prepare a direct contract with an NPD payer
From 1 October 2026 the rules of platform work get stricter: if a self-employed person works with one platform for longer than six months and more than 160 hours a month, the platform blocks the “customer — contractor” pair for two months. A direct civil-law contract with an NPD payer does not automatically fall under that block — but the risk of reclassification as employment has not gone away. Before the deadline it makes sense to rewrite the wording: a result, not a schedule; certificates; a check of NPD status; no job titles and no salaries.
This is a guide, not legal advice. The text of 289-FZ and official explanations may be refined — check the current text of the law and keep the contract version as of the date it was made.
If you have an old civil-law template and a new version “for NPD” — first record the differences, then agree them with the contractor:
What the logic of 289-FZ changes for the customer
The platform-economy law is aimed at intermediaries: aggregators and order platforms. The threshold “6 months + 160 hours a month” starts a cooling-off period: the platform does not let the same parties continue the link for two months. Long full engagement through a platform is a reclassification-risk zone.
The platform itself does not “block” a direct contract with a self-employed person. But the tax authority and the courts look at the same signs: continuity, a schedule, subordination, the customer’s tools, and the absence of a result as the subject. If your civil-law contract looks like employment, the 1 October deadline only highlights the problem. It does not create it from scratch.
What to rewrite in the contract before 1 October
1. The subject is a result, not a process
- Describe a measurable result (a report, a batch of content, a closed development stage)
- Remove shifts, “a working day from 9 to 18”, a timesheet, and a duty to “be on call at all times”
- Deadlines are delivery dates, not an attendance regime
2. Certificates and acceptance
- Each stage is closed by a certificate or an electronic confirmation of the result
- Payment is tied to acceptance, not to a “monthly salary”
- The NPD receipt is a required annex to the payout
3. NPD status and bans on “staff-like” terms
- A check of self-employed status before the contract and before each large payout
- No job title, staffing table, leave, or sick leave “as for an employee”
- The contractor chooses the methods and means, unless something else is needed for the result
A practical step
Search the template for: “salary”, “job title”, “schedule”, “workplace”, “employment”. Each hit is a candidate for deletion or for rewriting around a result. Then compare the old and new versions of the contract.
A direct civil-law contract and a platform: two different tracks
If you hire through a platform, watch the 160-hour threshold and the length of cooperation: once the rule triggers, the pair will be frozen for two months, and you will not be able to “simply re-register the same person on the same platform”. If you work directly, the platform block does not apply to you, but you need a clean civil-law frame and discipline on receipts.
Do not mix the schemes in one document: “as on the platform, but we pay to a card with no receipt” is a fast path to claims. Either a platform contract under the intermediary’s rules, or a direct civil-law contract with NPD and certificates.
A template “for a self-employed person” is easy to assemble from a brief and immediately run for signs of employment:
Checklist before 1 October 2026
- The subject of the contract is a result and stages, not a job title and a schedule
- There is a certificate procedure, and payment is tied to acceptance
- An NPD status check and a receipt requirement are fixed
- Salary, leave, “workplace”, and staff-style subordination are removed
- It is clear whether you go through a platform (the 160-hour cap) or directly
- The old and new contract versions are saved and compared
Related reading
- How to draft a contract with a self-employed person
- Civil-law contract vs employment contract
- How to check a civil-law contract
- Contracts for freelancers
Short conclusion
By 1 October 2026 platforms will cut long full links more strictly under the 160-hour rule. A direct contract with an NPD payer does not automatically insure you against the block — it needs to be brought to the form “result + certificates + receipt”, without employment markers. The deadline is useful as a date to revise templates, not as the day “when everything breaks by itself”.
Assemble or check an NPD contract in DocumentCHEK
Upload the current civil-law contract, or assemble a draft for a self-employed person — get a review of reclassification risk and one-sided terms.
Need to compare the old and new template? Compare two versions.